I've never had a problem with the blank page. Writing, for me, is like diving into a great empty space where anything is possible – people, challenges, worlds, words pop into being just by sitting down and hitting 26 letters in various combinations and seeing what comes out.* It doesn't have to be right, it doesn't have to be perfect, it doesn't even have to make sense or flow all the time, but it's a lot of fun to swim in it and goof around, poking and prodding to see what emerges from brain-to-flying-fingertips.
And then there's revision.
Revision has not been fun. I have heard rumors that some authors love the revision process, but I'm convinced they are either lying or have been body-snatched by alien zombies and brainwashed by those who thought that Ice Milk and Tofutti was a good idea. I'm here to say that I, at least, am not one of these people. I confess that I'd rather spend eternity eating shards of broken glass or, more frightening, willingly watch a Pee Wee Playhouse marathon. Rewriting and collaborating with my critique partners and helpful soundboards without whom I would never survive and could not in a million years ever express my undying gratitude to its fullest (*ahem*) is not only helpful and enjoyable in that scratching-a-stubborn-mosquito-bite sort of way, but major revising of the manuscript for the individual and publishing house who are willing to pay me to make it better is another story altogether... specifically, MY remade story.
Pressure much?

This is not the "nothing" that has been fun to play in. This is more like a yawning abyss sort of "nothing". This is a Nothing like Atreyu's – something ravenous, voracious, terrible and frightening. An undoing of words. My story becoming undone. It's not creating something new, it's trying to induce selective-amnesia while simultaneously retaining enough of the original idea to make it recognizable. Like closing one eye and painting with the opposite hand. Or writing your name upside-down a backwards while whistling Dixie and chewing saltines. The process is more like Marquis de Sade than Anne Lamott. An exercise that elicits visions of racks, thumbscrews, and being chained to a desk in the Pit of Despair (Or Jeff Somers' equivalent).

This, of course, is leagues from the truth.
At an SCBWI conference, one of the speakers (I suspect Richard Peck) described revision as a "Re-Vision": a reexamining and recreation of the original murky thoughts into something refined and solid. Once we've fumbled around the initial epiphanies, this was the chance – now that we were familiar with the concept – to bring the vision to its fullest potential.
Nice words, but he's friggin' Richard Peck! Me, I'm sweating.
Eventually I broke down and confessed my sins of revision hell to my editor, Julie Strauss-Gabel, who patiently listened to me trying to be professional while angsting like an emo-tween and she laid down one of her classic, concentrated-for-maximum-impact lines of wisdom: "Whenever something hurts to get out, it's a sign that it's too complicated. Simplify it, or cut." She then proceeded to tell me exactly how to solve the problem and a three-sentence breakdown of the entire book's plot and there, what was I worried about? I blinked and thought to myself, "This woman is a genius," which, in fact, she is.
I had to remind myself that this is a generous nothing, one which grants me the freedom to explore, improve, ask the tough questions and have my characters answer because they aren't just vague images anymore, these are living, breathing, fictitious people who are whole and familiar to me. Now they *can* answer me and their story is richer for it because now we know one another. The story dips into darker waters and the colors come out: reflected sky blue turns to turquoise, cobalt, deepens to sapphire, aquamarine, pine and midnight-black. This is the nothing Alanis Morissette sings about: the one she thanks profusely from the bottom of her heart.
So that's my Paying It Forward to those struggling with revision: be kind to yourself and your words, know that these initial sparks of brilliance were the things that started it all, but they only hold the gemstones you've placed there; it's the revising, digging deeper and harder, and clearing away a lot of extraneous layers of stuff, cutting and hacking and polishing the edges that let the whole story shine through.
(...and when you don't feel up to the task, click here & play!) :-)
* Sort of like monkeys writing Shakespeare. Or Baseball Mogul. (inside joke)
** All altered pics are a tribute to
m_stiefvater who is far better at this than I!
Revision has not been fun. I have heard rumors that some authors love the revision process, but I'm convinced they are either lying or have been body-snatched by alien zombies and brainwashed by those who thought that Ice Milk and Tofutti was a good idea. I'm here to say that I, at least, am not one of these people. I confess that I'd rather spend eternity eating shards of broken glass or, more frightening, willingly watch a Pee Wee Playhouse marathon. Rewriting and collaborating with my critique partners and helpful soundboards without whom I would never survive and could not in a million years ever express my undying gratitude to its fullest (*ahem*) is not only helpful and enjoyable in that scratching-a-stubborn-mosquito-bite sort of way, but major revising of the manuscript for the individual and publishing house who are willing to pay me to make it better is another story altogether... specifically, MY remade story.
Pressure much?
This is not the "nothing" that has been fun to play in. This is more like a yawning abyss sort of "nothing". This is a Nothing like Atreyu's – something ravenous, voracious, terrible and frightening. An undoing of words. My story becoming undone. It's not creating something new, it's trying to induce selective-amnesia while simultaneously retaining enough of the original idea to make it recognizable. Like closing one eye and painting with the opposite hand. Or writing your name upside-down a backwards while whistling Dixie and chewing saltines. The process is more like Marquis de Sade than Anne Lamott. An exercise that elicits visions of racks, thumbscrews, and being chained to a desk in the Pit of Despair (Or Jeff Somers' equivalent).
This, of course, is leagues from the truth.
At an SCBWI conference, one of the speakers (I suspect Richard Peck) described revision as a "Re-Vision": a reexamining and recreation of the original murky thoughts into something refined and solid. Once we've fumbled around the initial epiphanies, this was the chance – now that we were familiar with the concept – to bring the vision to its fullest potential.
Nice words, but he's friggin' Richard Peck! Me, I'm sweating.
Eventually I broke down and confessed my sins of revision hell to my editor, Julie Strauss-Gabel, who patiently listened to me trying to be professional while angsting like an emo-tween and she laid down one of her classic, concentrated-for-maximum-impact lines of wisdom: "Whenever something hurts to get out, it's a sign that it's too complicated. Simplify it, or cut." She then proceeded to tell me exactly how to solve the problem and a three-sentence breakdown of the entire book's plot and there, what was I worried about? I blinked and thought to myself, "This woman is a genius," which, in fact, she is.
I had to remind myself that this is a generous nothing, one which grants me the freedom to explore, improve, ask the tough questions and have my characters answer because they aren't just vague images anymore, these are living, breathing, fictitious people who are whole and familiar to me. Now they *can* answer me and their story is richer for it because now we know one another. The story dips into darker waters and the colors come out: reflected sky blue turns to turquoise, cobalt, deepens to sapphire, aquamarine, pine and midnight-black. This is the nothing Alanis Morissette sings about: the one she thanks profusely from the bottom of her heart.
So that's my Paying It Forward to those struggling with revision: be kind to yourself and your words, know that these initial sparks of brilliance were the things that started it all, but they only hold the gemstones you've placed there; it's the revising, digging deeper and harder, and clearing away a lot of extraneous layers of stuff, cutting and hacking and polishing the edges that let the whole story shine through.
(...and when you don't feel up to the task, click here & play!) :-)
* Sort of like monkeys writing Shakespeare. Or Baseball Mogul. (inside joke)
** All altered pics are a tribute to


Comments
I don't know if that's GOOD advice, but it's worked for me while hacking! ;-)
I've cut about 15K from my manuscript. I'm glad of word-trimming; I think it cuts down on bloat, but my problem is that my revision isn't a revision so much as rewriting. The essential story is the same, but how my characters get to where they're going is entirely different. MY. HEAD. HURTS.
On an unrelated note, I can indeed write my name upside down and backwards with ease. One of the weird things about being ambidextrous; my brain twists words and shapes in strange ways.
My husband can write his name upside down and backwards with ease, too -- part of having a touch of dyslexia, apparently. My brain twists and bends in strange ways, but I have no neat excuse! ;-)
I am about to query this week! I'm scared! Gaah! (And if I ever get represented/sell my work, I'm probably going to have to revise my novel AGAIN. And again. Right now, I don't even want to THINK about that.)
Still, it's a comfort to know I'm not the only one who hates revision. I agree that those authors who say they like revision have been body snatched. ;-)
I have to say that most of the pressure is mine-all-mine, my editor has been nothing but supportive and wise. Still, it's my first time trying to work things for another's vision and that's been a challenge I've never faced before.
Once more into the brink!!
My sister just asked me to co-author a book with her. We'll see how it goes. =D
I'll take you to my leader if you'd like me to. ;>)
(Great post, btw. Thanks for sharing "the other side" with me.)
That slant of seeing can leave me confused about where to go, confused about what I'm seeing, or confused about making it better (or worse).
It's difficult to know what to keep and what to cut, which is why a critique group or at the least a few good readers can give feedback about pacing, characterization, etc.
Oh, and I *LOVE* Alanis Morissette!
I love Alanis Morissette's lyrics something fierce. Of course, I remember her vaguely from You Can't Do That On Television so that colors my memories with delightful green slime! *hee hee*
I'm going to be an author of a real live book. WHEEE!
(And thanks to Kristin at TWFT for the interview!)
I kind of envy you being at that stage
I'm sure I'll envy this innocence, too, when I'm on the flipside of the experience. Until then: AHHHH! ;-)
My ideas and playing around tend to come before I sit down to write. I talk to myself a lot, and even roleplay some scenes or characters - and do a lot of reading and googling. But when I sit down to write, it is as if I do both the writing and the revising as one, single process.
I always edit while I write. I go back and forth and back and forth and cut and tweak and rewrite, paragraph after paragraph - because I need my text to have that force, that temperature, right away. If I don't achieve that, I lose momentum and get lost in a lot of boring rubbish and the story will pane out and my ideas go away... I can't leave a chapter and start a new one until I feel that not one single word is wrong or superfluous...
Maybe I'm a bit weird? - but so far, it has worked for me.
Glutton for punishment, I suppose.